icons
icons
images

Compliance Kart is a digital platform that enables businesses, organizations, and individuals to trade and manage carbon credits with transparency and ease. The platform ensures credibility through verified carbon credits, offering solutions for emission tracking, reporting, and regulatory compliance

images

Industry:

Carbon exchange

images

Role:

UX Research & Design responsive UI

images

Tools:

Figma, FigJam & Adobe Photoshop

images

Overview

A carbon exchange company provides a digital marketplace where organizations, governments, and individuals can buy, sell, or trade carbon credits to offset greenhouse gas emissions. It acts as a bridge between entities generating carbon offsets (such as renewable energy projects, reforestation initiatives, or sustainable farming practices) and businesses seeking to meet their sustainability targets or regulatory requirements. By ensuring transparency, traceability, and compliance, carbon exchange platforms promote accountability in climate action while encouraging investment in green projects.

Competitive Analysis

images

01_Air Carbon Exchange (ACX)

ACX is a digital exchange positioning itself as an institutional-grade market infrastructure for environmental instruments (spot carbon trading, custody, portfolio management)

Likes

  • Homepage and carbon pages highlight exchange capabilities and product offerings clearly (trading orientation).
  • Professional, market-style language and navigation that signals credibility to traders and corporate counterparties (e.g., “solutions”, custody, institutional features).

Dislikes

  • Dense, institutionally-oriented UI pattern - can be intimidating for non-trader corporate buyers (lack of gentle onboarding or simplified procurement flows).
  • Less emphasis on visual storytelling/provenance at the listing or project level; more focused on market-level metrics than project narratives.
images

02_ClimateTrade

ClimateTrade runs a marketplace focused on direct offsets, leveraging blockchain for provenance and provides carbon footprint calculators for onboarding buyers.

Likes

  • Easy, consumer-friendly marketplace flows and corporate calculations (footprint calculators).
  • Emphasis on transparency about blockchain-based cancellation/retirement — helps establish traceability

Dislikes

  • Marketplace UX is simpler but lacks advanced trading analytics or portfolio dashboards for enterprise finance teams.
  • Blockchain provenance is communicated, but the technical proofs (tx hashes / registry cancellation) may be behind secondary screens.
images

03_Toucan

Toucan provides tooling to bridge off-chain credits on-chain (TCO2, NCT) and is infrastructure-first (protocol, docs, bridges).

Likes

  • Strong developer/protocol documentation and clear bridging UX for on-chain flows - good model for a transparent technical control panel.
  • Displays token supply / volumes and on-chain metrics clearly for web3 audiences.

Dislikes

  • Assumes crypto literacy - needs translation for enterprise procurement and legal/compliance audiences.
  • Tokenization controversies (e.g., registry tokenization restrictions) create trust friction that must be handled in UX.
images

04_Verra

Verra runs the Verified Carbon Standard and an issuance/retirement registry - it’s the authoritative record hub for many voluntary credits. Registry UX is functional and compliance-focused.

Likes

  • Authoritative, compliance-driven interface - provides the canonical issuance/retirement records that marketplaces must link to.

Dislikes

  • Registry UIs are purpose-built for issuers & auditors - they’re not consumer-friendly; they lack modern visual storytelling or procurement - friendly summaries.

Information Architecture

images

Design System

Color Palette

images

Typography

images

UI Designs

Home Page (Seller)

images

Certificates (Seller)

images

Companies (Seller)

images

Add new company (Seller)

images

Projects (Seller)

images

Add new project (Seller)

images
mockup

Essential findings

Challenge

  • Carbon exchanges deal with credits, offsets, emissions data, and trading values. Representing these numbers with clarity through charts, dashboards, and metrics without overwhelming users.
  • Carbon markets can feel abstract and unregulated to some. Designing UI that communicates credibility (clear transaction history, verified partners, certificates, and compliance badges).
  • Building a flexible UI that serves both user types without clutter or confusion.
  • Striking the right balance in tone and design.

Lesson learned

  • Users struggle with interpreting raw emissions and trading data. Use data visualization (charts, infographics, progress trackers) to make carbon impact tangible.
  • Highlight certifications, verified partners, and transparent reporting upfront to build credibility.
  • Climate action is driven by both purpose (impact) and profit (returns). Balance sustainability storytelling with trading efficiency in the UI.
  • Keep gamified elements subtle (impact badges, progress meters) while maintaining a professional tone for corporate users.

View more work

images

Publishing Books & Education

Case Study

images
images

Diagnostic center that collect

samples from home.

Case Study

images
images

Finding Jeans that fit

Case Study

images

View All

images

My design philosophy

As a UI/UX designer, my philosophy is to create experiences that are simple, intuitive, and human-centered. I believe in designing with empathy—understanding user needs deeply, reducing complexity, and ensuring accessibility for all. For me, good design balances function and aesthetics, making technology feel effortless while leaving a lasting impact.

Reach out

icons
icons
images

Compliance Kart is a digital platform that enables businesses, organizations, and individuals to trade and manage carbon credits with transparency and ease. The platform ensures credibility through verified carbon credits, offering solutions for emission tracking, reporting, and regulatory compliance

images

Industry:

Carbon exchange

images

Role:

UX Research & Design responsive UI

images

Tools:

Figma, FigJam & Adobe Photoshop

images

Overview

A carbon exchange company provides a digital marketplace where organizations, governments, and individuals can buy, sell, or trade carbon credits to offset greenhouse gas emissions. It acts as a bridge between entities generating carbon offsets (such as renewable energy projects, reforestation initiatives, or sustainable farming practices) and businesses seeking to meet their sustainability targets or regulatory requirements. By ensuring transparency, traceability, and compliance, carbon exchange platforms promote accountability in climate action while encouraging investment in green projects.

Competitive Analysis

images

01_Air Carbon Exchange (ACX)

ACX is a digital exchange positioning itself as an institutional-grade market infrastructure for environmental instruments (spot carbon trading, custody, portfolio management)

Likes

  • Homepage and carbon pages highlight exchange capabilities and product offerings clearly (trading orientation).
  • Professional, market-style language and navigation that signals credibility to traders and corporate counterparties (e.g., “solutions”, custody, institutional features).

Dislikes

  • Dense, institutionally-oriented UI pattern - can be intimidating for non-trader corporate buyers (lack of gentle onboarding or simplified procurement flows).
  • Less emphasis on visual storytelling/provenance at the listing or project level; more focused on market-level metrics than project narratives.
images

02_ClimateTrade

ClimateTrade runs a marketplace focused on direct offsets, leveraging blockchain for provenance and provides carbon footprint calculators for onboarding buyers.

Likes

  • Easy, consumer-friendly marketplace flows and corporate calculations (footprint calculators).
  • Emphasis on transparency about blockchain-based cancellation/retirement — helps establish traceability

Dislikes

  • Marketplace UX is simpler but lacks advanced trading analytics or portfolio dashboards for enterprise finance teams.
  • Blockchain provenance is communicated, but the technical proofs (tx hashes / registry cancellation) may be behind secondary screens.
images

03_Toucan

Toucan provides tooling to bridge off-chain credits on-chain (TCO2, NCT) and is infrastructure-first (protocol, docs, bridges).

Likes

  • Strong developer/protocol documentation and clear bridging UX for on-chain flows - good model for a transparent technical control panel.
  • Displays token supply / volumes and on-chain metrics clearly for web3 audiences.

Dislikes

  • Assumes crypto literacy - needs translation for enterprise procurement and legal/compliance audiences.
  • Tokenization controversies (e.g., registry tokenization restrictions) create trust friction that must be handled in UX.
images

04_Verra

Verra runs the Verified Carbon Standard and an issuance/retirement registry - it’s the authoritative record hub for many voluntary credits. Registry UX is functional and compliance-focused.

Likes

  • Authoritative, compliance-driven interface - provides the canonical issuance/retirement records that marketplaces must link to.

Dislikes

  • Registry UIs are purpose-built for issuers & auditors - they’re not consumer-friendly; they lack modern visual storytelling or procurement - friendly summaries.

Information Architecture

images

Design System

Color Palette

images

Typography

images

UI Designs

Home Page (Seller)

images

Certificates (Seller)

images

Companies (Seller)

images

Add new company (Seller)

images

Projects (Seller)

images

Add new project (Seller)

images
mockup

Essential findings

Challenge

  • Carbon exchanges deal with credits, offsets, emissions data, and trading values. Representing these numbers with clarity through charts, dashboards, and metrics without overwhelming users.
  • Carbon markets can feel abstract and unregulated to some. Designing UI that communicates credibility (clear transaction history, verified partners, certificates, and compliance badges).
  • Building a flexible UI that serves both user types without clutter or confusion.
  • Striking the right balance in tone and design.

Lesson learned

  • Users struggle with interpreting raw emissions and trading data. Use data visualization (charts, infographics, progress trackers) to make carbon impact tangible.
  • Highlight certifications, verified partners, and transparent reporting upfront to build credibility.
  • Climate action is driven by both purpose (impact) and profit (returns). Balance sustainability storytelling with trading efficiency in the UI.
  • Keep gamified elements subtle (impact badges, progress meters) while maintaining a professional tone for corporate users.

View more work

images

Publishing Books & Education

Case Study

images
images

Diagnostic center that collect samples from home.

Case Study

images
images

Finding Jeans that fit

Case Study

images

View All

images

My design philosophy

As a UI/UX designer, my philosophy is to create experiences that are simple, intuitive, and human-centered. I believe in designing with empathy—understanding user needs deeply, reducing complexity, and ensuring accessibility for all. For me, good design balances function and aesthetics, making technology feel effortless while leaving a lasting impact.

Reach out

icons
icons
images

Compliance Kart is a digital platform that enables businesses, organizations, and individuals to trade and manage carbon credits with transparency and ease. The platform ensures credibility through verified carbon credits, offering solutions for emission tracking, reporting, and regulatory compliance

images

Industry:

Carbon exchange

images

Role:

UX Research & Design responsive UI

images

Tools:

Figma, FigJam & Adobe Photoshop

images

Overview

A carbon exchange company provides a digital marketplace where organizations, governments, and individuals can buy, sell, or trade carbon credits to offset greenhouse gas emissions. It acts as a bridge between entities generating carbon offsets (such as renewable energy projects, reforestation initiatives, or sustainable farming practices) and businesses seeking to meet their sustainability targets or regulatory requirements. By ensuring transparency, traceability, and compliance, carbon exchange platforms promote accountability in climate action while encouraging investment in green projects.

Competitive Analysis

images

01_Air Carbon Exchange (ACX)

ACX is a digital exchange positioning itself as an institutional-grade market infrastructure for environmental instruments (spot carbon trading, custody, portfolio management)

Likes

  • Homepage and carbon pages highlight exchange capabilities and product offerings clearly (trading orientation).
  • Professional, market-style language and navigation that signals credibility to traders and corporate counterparties (e.g., “solutions”, custody, institutional features).

Dislikes

  • Dense, institutionally-oriented UI pattern - can be intimidating for non-trader corporate buyers (lack of gentle onboarding or simplified procurement flows).
  • Less emphasis on visual storytelling/provenance at the listing or project level; more focused on market-level metrics than project narratives.
images

02_ClimateTrade

ClimateTrade runs a marketplace focused on direct offsets, leveraging blockchain for provenance and provides carbon footprint calculators for onboarding buyers.

Likes

  • Easy, consumer-friendly marketplace flows and corporate calculations (footprint calculators).
  • Emphasis on transparency about blockchain-based cancellation/retirement — helps establish traceability.

Dislikes

  • Marketplace UX is simpler but lacks advanced trading analytics or portfolio dashboards for enterprise finance teams.
  • Blockchain provenance is communicated, but the technical proofs (tx hashes / registry cancellation) may be behind secondary screens.
images

03_Toucan

Toucan provides tooling to bridge off-chain credits on-chain (TCO2, NCT) and is infrastructure-first (protocol, docs, bridges).

Likes

  • Strong developer/protocol documentation and clear bridging UX for on-chain flows - good model for a transparent technical control panel.
  • Displays token supply / volumes and on-chain metrics clearly for web3 audiences.

Dislikes

  • Assumes crypto literacy - needs translation for enterprise procurement and legal/compliance audiences.
  • Tokenization controversies (e.g., registry tokenization restrictions) create trust friction that must be handled in UX.
images

04_Verra

Verra runs the Verified Carbon Standard and an issuance/retirement registry - it’s the authoritative record hub for many voluntary credits. Registry UX is functional and compliance-focused.

Likes

  • Authoritative, compliance-driven interface - provides the canonical issuance/retirement records that marketplaces must link to.

Dislikes

  • Registry UIs are purpose-built for issuers & auditors - they’re not consumer-friendly; they lack modern visual storytelling or procurement - friendly summaries.

Information Architecture

images

Design System

Color Palette

images

Typography

images

UI Designs

Home Page (Seller)

images

Certificates (Seller)

images

Companies (Seller)

images

Add new company (Seller)

images

Projects (Seller)

images

Add new project (Seller)

images
mockup

Essential findings

Challenge

  • Carbon exchanges deal with credits, offsets, emissions data, and trading values. Representing these numbers with clarity through charts, dashboards, and metrics without overwhelming users.
  • Carbon markets can feel abstract and unregulated to some. Designing UI that communicates credibility (clear transaction history, verified partners, certificates, and compliance badges).
  • Building a flexible UI that serves both user types without clutter or confusion.
  • Striking the right balance in tone and design.

Lesson learned

  • Users struggle with interpreting raw emissions and trading data. Use data visualization (charts, infographics, progress trackers) to make carbon impact tangible.
  • Highlight certifications, verified partners, and transparent reporting upfront to build credibility.
  • Climate action is driven by both purpose (impact) and profit (returns). Balance sustainability storytelling with trading efficiency in the UI.
  • Keep gamified elements subtle (impact badges, progress meters) while maintaining a professional tone for corporate users.

View more work

images

Publishing Books & Education

Case Study

images
images

Diagnostic center that collect samples from home.

Case Study

images
images

Finding Jeans that fit

Case Study

images

View All

images

My design philosophy

As a UI/UX designer, my philosophy is to create experiences that are simple, intuitive, and human-centered. I believe in designing with empathy—understanding user needs deeply, reducing complexity, and ensuring accessibility for all. For me, good design balances function and aesthetics, making technology feel effortless while leaving a lasting impact.

Reach out